Among the murderers of Imam Hussain (a.s.) The Evil Tree’ , Shimr, the accursed, stands out for his malevolence and notoriety.
Allah, the Glorified, states in the Holy Quran,
“…the example of an evil word is like that of an evil tree..” ( Ibrahim : 26 )
i.e. neither its roots are firm nor are its branches lofty. It is not firmly planted and can be uprooted easily. Likewise Allah says,
” And the accursed tree is also a source of depravity among the people .” ( Bani Israaeel : 60 )
Under these verses, both Shia and Sunni scholars have recorded traditions that
allude to the enemies of Ahle Bayt (a.s.) that accursed and damned tree. Among the antagonists of Ahle Bayt (a.s.), some account for the roots of this tree while some constitute the branches and some others make up for the leaves.
Shimr, the son of Zil Jawshan, occupies a despicable position among the killers of Imam Hussain, ‘ for which lovers of Imam (a.s.) single him out and curse profusely. Even the angels hold him in contempt and inflict unceasing abuses on him. So damned is he that even the one who sympathies with him is liable for this damnation.
“O Allah curse those who took up arms against Imam Husain! And curse those who were satisfied with his killers and curse those gave their fealty to them and those who subscribed them! O Allah curse them all!”
“O Allah curse Umar b Sa’ad and Shimr! Shimr played a pivotal role in the massacre perpetrated at Karbala in general and Imam Hussain’s murder in particular. In order to evaluate the gravity of his role, a detailed portrayal of Shimr’s life has been undertaken below.
Shimr was named Sharhabeel at birth. His agnomen (kuniyah) was Abu as-Saabegah. His father Zil Jawshan al-Ziyaabi was from the clan of Bani Kilaab. His name was mentioned among the affluent individuals of Hawaazan. Janab Ummul Baneen, mother of Hazrat Abbas (a.s.), was from the same clan. This is why Shimr on the 9th of Muharram, approached Imam Hussain’s camp, offering amnesty to Hazrat Abbas and his brothers. But they shunned his overtures and chose to stay with Imam (a.s.) and embrace martyrdom. They had recognized their Imam and their duties vis-a-vis the Imam and everything else to them seemed a mere distraction that would distance them from this recognition.
SHIMR’S ADVENT AT KARBALA
Tabari records that Umar b. Sa’ad’s inclination was for peace with Imam (a.s.), and was not favorably disposed towards a confrontation. When Ibne Ziyad learnt of this disposition, he wrote a letter to Shimr and commanded him to take it to Umar b. Sa’ad. He instructed him to ensure that Umar b. Sa’ad took the pledge of allegiance from Husain and his friends. If they acceded, then Shimr was to bring them to Ibne Ziyad, in a manner akin to slaves. However, if they did not, Shimr was to confront them. If Umar b. Sa’ad was also for confrontation then Shimr was to simply obey him. But, if the former desisted from waging a battle, then Shimr was to behead Umar b. Sa’ad, take charge of his army and wage a battle against Hussain.
At the same rime Ibne Ziyad also wrote a letter to Umar b. Sa’ad. He reprimanded him for trying to seek means of salvaging the situation and preventing a confrontation with Hussain (a.s.)….. If Umar did not wish to submit then he was to surrender charge of the army in favour of Shimr who was given suitable instructions.
PLEA FOR AMNESTY
When Shimr received his letter, he along with Abdullah b. Abi Mahal, approached Ubaydillah (the cursed) to plead exemption for the sons of his paternal aunt, Ummul Baneen binte Khuram. She was wife of Ameerul Mo’mineen, Ali, and had four sons from him viz.Abbas, Abdullah, Ja’far and Usman. Abdullah b. Abi Mahal explained to Ubaydillah that Ummul Baneen’s sons were in Hussain’s camp and beseeched Ubaydillah to write a letter of amnesty for them. The latter complied with this request and issued a letter. Abdullah b. Abi Mahal ordered his freed slave, Karman, to deliver the letter to his nephews. Karman did as ordered and handed over the letter to Ummul Baneen’s sons. However, the latter did not even bother reading the message. They said that they would never accept any immunity from Ibne Ziyad as Allah’s promise of deliverance was more veracious than that of Ibne Ziyad.
INTENSE ATTACHMENT TOWARDS IMAM
Tabari writes further, that on the eve of Ashoora, which happened to be a Thursday, Shimr approached Imam Hussain’s camp. He demanded, ‘Where are my nephews?’ Hearing him, Abbas, Abdullah, Usman and Ja’far, stepped out of their tents. They asked him, ‘What do you want with us?’ Shimr replied, ‘I bring tidings of reprieve for all of you?’ They retorted contemptuously, ‘Curse be upon you and your reprieve! You, our uncle, are willing to offer us immunity but deprive the Prophet’s son of it!’ ( Tarikh-e-Tabari part IV, page, 241-242, printed by Nafis Academy, Karachi )
Shimr’s low pedigree can be gauged from an incident that occurred on the day of Ashoora. Imam Hussain’s tent was pitched on a low-lying land. Imam (a.s.) had amassed some reeds and woods near his tent. The idea behind this was that in the event of a raid he could set alight the firewood and curtail the attack to only one direction. On the day of Aashoora, Imam (a.s.) was forced to resort to this move. When Shimr witnessed this spectacle, he rushed past Imam’s tents. The tongues of flames leapt high in the air blocking the tents from his view. He cried out to Imam (a.s.) in his insolence, ‘O Hussain! You seem impatient to enter the fire and could not wait for Qiyamat.’ Imam (a.s.) inquired from his companion. This seems like Shimr’. Imam’s companion affirmed. Imam (a.s.) cried, ‘O son of a herdsman! It is you who shall be engulfed in the fire.’ ( Tabari part IV, 250-251 )
Umar b. Sa’ad had stationed Amr b. Hajjaj on his right and Shimr on his left.
When Zuhair b. Qain (r.a.) exhorted Umar b. Sa’ad’s men to refrain from fighting against Imam Hussain’s (a.s.), Shimr shot an arrow at Zuhair. He castigated Zuhair thus, ‘May Allah strike you dumb! You talks have pestered us no end! Zuhair retorted, ‘I am not addressing you! By Allah, I know that you will find it difficult to comprehend even a couple of verses from the Quran! May the hereafter greet you with destruction and a painful chastisement!’
HIS ATTEMPTS TO SET ABLAZE THE AHLE BAYT (A.S.)
Shimr in the course of the battle at Karbala, attempted several forays on Imam Hussain’s tents with the intention of setting them ablaze. However, his henchmen chided him for his intention to raid helpless women and children. A person named Hameed remarked, “The murder of men by you is sufficient to please your master.” At that moment Zuhair assaulted Shimr with a group of ten soldiers. He forced Shimr to withdraw, but not before killing Abu Farah Zababt, one of Shimr’s close companions. ( Ibid, 265 )
HIS ATTACK ON THE IMAM’S TENTS
Shimr along with a band of ten Kufans advanced towards Imam’s tents which were inhabited by the Able Bayt (a.s.). They intercepted Imam (a.s.) and stood between him and the tents. On seeing this, Imam (a.s.) said, “Woe on you! You are devoid of any faith and if you don’t fear the hereafter, at least observe the basic human rights!”
SHIMR AND HIS CRONIES
When Shimr saw Imam (a.s.), he advanced towards him with his infantry. Among these were Abul Junoob Jo’fee, Qash’am b. Amr Jo’fee, Saleh b. Wahab Yazalee, Sinaan b, Anas Nakha’ee and Khulee b. Yazeed Asbahee. Shimr tried to instigate them into murdering Imam (a.s.). He commanded Abu Junoob to advance towards Imam (a.s.). The former rejoined. ‘Why don’t you (do it)?’ Stung with this reply, Shimr said, “You dare speak to me in this way!’ Abu Junoob shot back similarly, *You dare speak to me in this way!’ Shimr accused him of being slothful. Abu Junoob replied menacingly, ‘I will tear out your eyes with my dagger’. This had the desired effect and Shimr left him alone. But he kept muttering under his breath about getting even with Abu Junoob. ( Ibid 276 )
MUKHTAR AND SHIMR
Mukhtar Saqafee sent forth his slave Zarbi to track down Shimr. Muslim b. Abdullah Zababi, one of Shimr’s henchmen, relates, ‘Mukhtar’s slave, Zarbi gave us a chase. We had left Kufa behind us, riding on our skinny horses. He continued in hot pursuit, not willing to relent. When he closed in on us, Shimr cautioned, ‘Distance yourself from me, I think he is only after me.’ We hustled our horses.
When Zarbi, the slave had reached within striking distance, he assaulted Shimr. Shimr, warded off the blow. But meanwhile, Zarbi had parted from his companions. Shimr saw his chance and struck him so hard that he broke his spine, killing him. Later, when Zarbi’s corpse was taken to Mukhtar, he was aggrieved and said that he would never have permitted Zarbi to combat Shimr. Anyhow, Shimr, after killing Zarbi, fled to Saaneedma where he took shelter in a village called Qultaneesa, located on a riverbank. He hid near a hillock. He chanced upon a farmer from the village. He roughed him up and ordered him to pass on a letter to Mu’sab b. Zubair. That farmer took the letter and on his way had to traverse through a village. Incidentally Mukhtar had posted Abu Umrah in that village as a conduit between himself and the people of Basrah. A farmer from that village met this farmer (sent by Shimr) and complained to the latter of Shimr’s excesses. One of Abu Amarah’s men overheard this conversation and inquired about Shimr’s whereabouts from them. The farmer disclosed Shimr’s exact location, which was only some distance away. All of them set forth in that direction. On reaching the shack where Shimr had taken shelter, they encircled him and launched a concerted onslaught. Shimr was attired in only a cloak and nothing else. He tried to retaliate with his lance but in vain. His opponents were in a merciless mood and did not even spare him the chance to put on his clothes. Meanwhile, we were watching the entire episode from a distance. When we saw Shimr in this condition we decided to make ourselves scarce and fled silently. We had only gone a little distance when we heard the triumphant cries of ‘Allahu Akbar’ rejoicing Shimr’s death.’
Abdur Rahman b. Abul Kunood recounts, ‘I was the one who saw Shimr’s letter with the farmer and took him to Abu Umrah. And I was the one who finally killed Shimr.’
Ali Akbar Dehkhuda has chronicled in his ‘ Na’at Namah ‘ that Shimr actually fought the battle of Siffeen from Hazrat Ali’s side. He then settled down in Kufa. Eventually he participated in the carnage at Karbala and killed Imam Hussain (a.s.).
Indeed it is most ironical that one who fought the battle of Siffeen from Ameerul Mo’mineen’s army, a few years later slays his beloved son. However, it is not really astonishing. History is replete with such instances. Ibn Muljim is a case in point. He was one of the supporters of Ameerul Mo’mineen before he actually killed his own Imam. Therefore, one must never take the light of guidance for granted. On the contrary, one must allow for intense introspection to safeguard this light. God forbid, the generations to follow must not mention our names in the same breath as Shimr and Ibn Muljim.
Anyhow, Mukhtar Saqafee threw Shimr’s corpse to the dogs after slaying him.
Most of Shimr’s children migrated towards the west and settled down in Andaloos (Spain). The one to achieve some prominence was his grandson, Samil b. Hatim b. Shimr b. Zil Jawshan.